Medical Policy: 02.01.48
Original Effective Date: May 2012
Reviewed: February 2017
Revised: February 2016
Benefit determinations are based on the applicable contract language in effect at the time the services were rendered. Exclusions, limitations or exceptions may apply. Benefits may vary based on contract, and individual member benefits must be verified. Wellmark determines medical necessity only if the benefit exists and no contract exclusions are applicable. This medical policy may not apply to FEP. Benefits are determined by the Federal Employee Program.
This Medical Policy document describes the status of medical technology at the time the document was developed. Since that time, new technology may have emerged or new medical literature may have been published. This Medical Policy will be reviewed regularly and be updated as scientific and medical literature becomes available.
Current techniques for diagnosing and monitoring asthma and predicting exacerbations are peak flow measurement and spirometry. Two new strategies, evaluation of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and exhaled breath condensate are proposed. These techniques are also potentially useful in the management of other conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic cough. There are commercially available devices for measuring NO in expired breath and various laboratory techniques for evaluating components of exhaled breath condensate.
Guidelines for the management of persistent asthma stress the importance of long-term suppression of inflammation using steroids, leukotriene inhibitors, or other anti-inflammatory drugs. Existing techniques for monitoring the status of underlying inflammation have focused on bronchoscopy, with lavage and biopsy, or analysis by induced sputum. Current standards in the assessment of asthma focuses not on the status of the underlying chronic inflammation, but rather on regular assessments of respiratory parameters such as forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and peak flow. There has been interest in noninvasive techniques to assess the underlying pathogenic chronic inflammation as reflected by measurements of inflammatory mediators. Two proposed strategies are the measurement of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and the evaluation of exhaled breath condensate.
Nitric oxide is an important endogenous messenger and inflammatory mediator that is widespread in the human body, functioning, for example, to regulate peripheral blood flow, platelet function, immune reactions, and neurotransmission and to mediate inflammation. In biologic tissues, NO is unstable, limiting measurement. However, in the gas phase, NO is fairly stable, permitting its measurement in exhaled air. Exhaled NO is typically measured during single breath exhalations. First, the subject inspires nitric oxide-free air via a mouthpiece until total lung capacity is achieved, followed immediately by exhalation through the mouthpiece into the measuring device. Several devices measuring exhaled NO are commercially available in the United States. According to a 2009 joint statement by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS), there is a consensus that the fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is best measured at an exhaled rate of 50 mL per second (FeNO 50 mL/s) maintained within 10% for more than 6 seconds at an oral pressure between 5 and 20 cm H2O. (1) Results are expressed as the NO concentration in parts per billion (ppb), based on the mean of 2 or 3 values.
Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) consists of exhaled air passed through a condensing or cooling apparatus, resulting in an accumulation of fluid. Although EBC is primarily derived from water vapor, it also contains aerosol particles or respiratory fluid droplets, which in turn contain various nonvolatile inflammatory mediators, such as cytokines, leukotrienes, oxidants, antioxidants, and various other markers of oxidative stress. There are a variety of laboratory techniques to measure the components of EBC, including such simple techniques as pH measurement, to the more sophisticated gas chromatography/mass spectrometry or high performance liquid chromatography, depending on the component of interest.
Measurement of NO and EBC has been investigated in the diagnosis and management of asthma. Potential uses in management of asthma include assessing response to anti-inflammatory treatment, monitoring compliance with treatment, and predicting exacerbations. Aside from asthma, they have also been proposed in the management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis, allergic rhinitis, and primary ciliary dyskinesia.
The following devices/systems have been cleared for marketing by the FDA:
The RTube Exhaled Breath Condensate collection system (Respiratory Research, Inc) is registered with the FDA as a Class I device that collects expired gas. Respiratory Research has a proprietary gas-standardized pH assay, which, when performed by the company, is considered a laboratory-developed test.
The ATS/ERS statement includes the following recommendations regarding use of biomarkers in clinical practice:
The authors acknowledge that more information is required on the utility of FENO measurement as a tool for monitoring asthma control, and that there is a need for translational research to clarify the relationship between biomarkers and other parameters of asthma control, to establish the optimal frequency of monitoring, and to confirm the clinical and cost effectiveness of biomarker measurements in primary care and other settings.
Regarding exhaled breath condensate, the statement concludes that more work is needed on the validation of the various measures from EBC, and to describe the relationship between these measures and other markers of asthma control. The authors concluded that studies to address whether using EBC results in improved clinical decision-making or better asthma outcomes are required.
The accuracy of the cutoffs recommended by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines has not been evaluated in the diagnosis of asthma. In addition, no studies were identified that evaluated whether the use of FENO improved the accuracy of asthma diagnosis compared with clinical diagnosis. Given these limitations, it is not possible to evaluate whether the use of FENO levels in clinical practice improves the accuracy of diagnosing asthma
Guidelines from the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA, 2012) state that levels of FENO and carbon monoxide have been suggested as non-invasive markers of airway inflammation in asthma. The guidelines state that levels of FENO are elevated in people with asthma (who are not taking inhaled glucocorticosteroids) compared to people without asthma, yet these findings are not specific for asthma. The guidelines note the FENO has not been evaluated prospectively as an aid in asthma diagnosis, but these measurements are being evaluated for potential use in determining optimal treatment, "although it has been shown that the use of FENO as a measure of asthma control does not improve control or enable reduction in dose of inhaled glucocorticosteroid." The Global Initiative for Asthma was launched in conjunction with the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute and the World Health Organization.
While FENO levels generally predict which patients will respond to inhaled glucocorticoid therapy,the largest trials and a systematic review did not find sufficient evidence to support routine use of FENO to guide asthma therapy.
Measurement of exhaled nitric oxide is considered investigational in the diagnosis and management of asthma and all other disorders including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic cough.
Measurement of exhaled breath condensate is considered investigational in the diagnosis and management of asthma and all other disorders including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic cough.
The evidence is insufficient to determine the effect of exhaled nitric oxide and exhaled breath condensate tests on health outcomes. The recent studies do prove that there is treatment change with the addition of FENO measurements, but fail to examine the effect of the treatment changes on outcomes. There is still no validated standardized cutoff of FENO to use for diagnosing asthma. As a result, it is not possible to determine the true sensitivity and specificity of the test for diagnosing asthma or any other disorder. Further investigation is recommended because a negative result does not exclude asthma. Inhaled steroids are a mainstay of treatment of asthma and have been associated with a variety of health outcome benefits. The change in management must be examined to determine net benefits on health outcomes. Recent systematic review concluded FENO guided management showed no statistically significant benefit in terms of severe exacerbations or ICS use, but showed a statistically significant reduction in exacerbations of any severity. However, further research is warranted to clearly define which management protocols (including cut-off points) offer best efficacy and which patient groups would benefit the most.
Wellmark medical policies address the complex issue of technology assessment of new and emerging treatments, devices, drugs, etc. They are developed to assist in administering plan benefits and constitute neither offers of coverage nor medical advice. Wellmark medical policies contain only a partial, general description of plan or program benefits and do not constitute a contract. Wellmark does not provide health care services and, therefore, cannot guarantee any results or outcomes. Participating providers are independent contractors in private practice and are neither employees nor agents of Wellmark or its affiliates. Treating providers are solely responsible for medical advice and treatment of members. Our medical policies may be updated and therefore are subject to change without notice.
*Current Procedural Terminology © 2012 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.