Contact Us
Plans & Services Health & Wellness About Wellmark Member Employer Broker Provider
Home Provider Medical Policies & Authorizations Alphabetical Listing
» Register for Wellmark.com
» Claims & Payment
» Communication & Resources
» Credentialing & Enrollment
» Health Management
» Medical, Dental, & Pharmacy
» Medical Policies & Authorizations
 Printer-Friendly Page

Extracorporeal Photopheresis

» Summary » Procedure Codes
» Description » Selected References
» Prior Approval » Policy History
» Policy
 

Medical Policy: 08.01.09 
Original Effective Date: December 2000 
Reviewed: November 2011 
Revised: September 2010 


Benefit Application
Benefit determinations are based on the applicable contract language in effect at the time the services were rendered. Exclusions, limitations or exceptions may apply. Benefits may vary based on contract, and individual member benefits must be verified. Wellmark determines medical necessity only if the benefit exists and no contract exclusions are applicable. This medical policy may not apply to FEP. Benefits are determined by the Federal Employee Program.

This Medical Policy document describes the status of medical technology at the time the document was developed. Since that time, new technology may have emerged or new medical literature may have been published. This Medical Policy will be reviewed regularly and be updated as scientific and medical literature becomes available.


Description: 

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a leukapheresis-based immunomodulatory procedure that involves the following steps: the patient’s blood is collected and the leukocyte-rich portion is separated, the photosensitizer agent 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) is added to the lymphocyte fraction, which is then exposed to ultraviolet A light, and the light-sensitized lymphocytes are reinfused into the patient.

 

Treatment of Graft-versus-Host Disease

ECP as a treatment of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after a prior allogeneic stem-cell transplant is based on the fact that GVHD is an immunologically mediated disease. GVHD can be categorized into acute disease, occurring within the first 100 days after infusion of allogeneic cells, or chronic disease, which develops some time after 100 days. Acute GVHD is commonly graded from I-IV, ranging from mild disease, which is characterized by a skin rash without involvement of the liver or gut, to grades III and IV, which are characterized by generalized erythroderma, elevated bilirubin levels or diarrhea. Chronic GVHD typically presents with more divers symptoms resembling autoimmune diseases such as progressive systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or rheumatoid arthritis. It may affect the mouth, eyes, respiratory tract, musculoskeletal system, peripheral nerves, as well as the skin, liver, or gut.

 

Treatment of Organ Transplant Rejection

The standard of care for treatment of organ transplant rejection is immunosuppression, with the particular regimen dictated by the organ being transplanted. Immunosuppression is used to lower the responsiveness of the organ recipient’s immune system thereby decreasing the likelihood of rejection. Although the specific mechanism of ECP is not known, the reinfusion of treated leukocytes seems to specifically suppress the immune response to the donor organ, while maintaining the body’s ability to respond to other antigens. The specificity of ECP to target the immune response to the transplanted organ allows ECP to decrease organ rejection without an increased risk of infection, common with immunosuppressant drugs.

 

Treatment of Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a neoplasia of malignant T-lymphocytes that initially present as skin involvement. CTCL is extremely rare, with an estimated incidence of about 0.4 per 100,000 annually but, because most are low-grade malignancies with long survival, the overall prevalence is much higher. Two variants, mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome, account for approximately 60% and 5% of new cases, respectively. Appropriate therapy of CTCL depends on a variety of factors, including stage, patient’s overall health, and the presence of symptoms. Therapies can be categorized into topical and systemic treatments that include ECP.

 

Treatment of Autoimmune Disease

The use of ECP as a treatment of autoimmune disease is based on the premise that pathogenic lymphocytes form an expanded clone of cells, which are damaged when exposed to UV light in the presence of 8-MOP. It is hypothesized that the resulting damage induces a population of circulating suppressor T cells targeted against the light-damaged cells. It is further hypothesized that these suppressor T-cells are targeted as a component of the cell that is common to the entire clone of abnormal cells (i.e., not just the light-sensitized cells), thus inducing a systemic effect. However, although scleroderma and other autoimmune diseases are associated with the presence of circulating antibodies, it is not certain how these antibodies are related to the pathogenesis of the disease, and photopheresis is not associated with consistent changes in autoantibody levels.


Top


Prior Approval: 

 

Not applicable


Top


Policy: 

Graft-versus-Host Disease

Extracorporeal photopheresis may be considered medically necessary as a technique to treat chronic graft-versus-host disease that is refractory to medical therapy.

 

Extracorporeal photopheresis is considered investigational as a technique to treat acute graft-versus-host disease or chronic graft-versus-host disease that is either previously untreated or is responding to established therapies.

 

Organ Transplant Rejection

Extracorporeal photopheresis may be considered medically necessary to treat cardiac allograft rejection, including acute rejection, that is either recurrent or that is refractory to standard immunosuppressive drug treatment.

 

Extracorporeal photopheresis is considered investigational in all other situations related to treatment or prevention of rejection in solid-organ transplantation.

 

Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma

Extracorporeal photopheresis may be considered medically necessary as a technique to treat late-stage (III/IV) cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

 

Extracorporeal photopheresis may be considered medically necessary as a technique to treat early-stage (I/II) cutaneous T-cell lymphoma that is progressive and refractory to established nonsystemic therapies.

 

Extracorporeal photopheresis is considered investigational as a technique to treat early stage (I/II) cutaneous T-cell lymphoma that is either previously untreated or is respnding to established nonsystemic therapies.

 

Autoimmune Diseases

Extracorporeal photopheresis is considered investigational as a technique to treat either the cutaneous or visceral manifestations of autoimmune diseases, including but not limited to:

  • progressive systemic sclerosis (scleroderma)
  • systemic lupus erythematosus
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • pemphigus and other autoimmune bullous diseases
  • psoriasis
  • psoriatic arthritis or psoriasis vulgaris
  • multiple sclerosis
  • type 1 diabetes mellitus


Top


Procedure Codes and Billing Guidelines: 

  • To report provider services, use appropriate CPT* codes, Modifiers, Alpha Numeric (HCPCS level 2) codes, Revenue codes, and/or ICD-9 diagnostic codes.
  • 36522 Photopheresis, extracorporeal

Top


Selected References: 

  • Enomoto DN, Mekkes JR, Bossuyt PM, et al. Treatment of patients with systemic sclerosis with extracorporeal photochemptherapy (photopheresis). J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999 Dec;41(6):915-22.
  • Rostami AM, Sater RA, Bird SJ, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of extracorporeal photopheresis in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 1999 Jun;5(3):198-203.
  • French LE, Lessin SR, Addya K, et al. Identification of clonal T cells in the blood of patients with systemic sclerosis: positive correlation with response to photopheresis. Arch Dermatol. 2001 Oct;137(10):1309-13.
  • Greinix HT, Volc-Platzer B, Rabitsch W, et al. Successful use of extracorporeal photochemotherapy in the treatment of severe acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 1998 Nov 1;92(9):3090-104.
  • Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee Extracorporeal photopheresis. Updated March 26, 2006. Accessed April 29,2009. Available at this URL
  • ECRI. Extracorporeal Photopheresis for Transplant Rejection. Plymouth Meeting (PA): ECRI Health Technology Information Service; 2007 January 10. 5 p. (ECRI Hotline Response). Also available: http://www.ecri.org.
  • ECRI. Applications of Extracorporeal Photopheresis. Plymouth Meeting (PA): ECRI Health Technology Information Service; 2008 April 10. 11 p. (ECRI Hotline Response). Also available: http://www.ecri.org.
  • Marques MB, Tuncer HH. Photopheresis in solid organ transplant refection. J Clin Apher 2006; 21(1):72-7.
  • Szczepiorkowski ZM, Bandarenko N, Kim HC et al. Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice: evidence-based approach from the Apheresis Applications Committee of the American Society for Apheresis. J Clin Apher 2007; 22(3):106-75.
  • Maccherini M, Diciolla F, Laghi Pasini F et al. Photopheresis immunomodulation after heart transplantation. Transplant Proc 2001; 33(1-2):1591-4.
  • Benden C, Speich R, Hofbauer GF et al. Extracorporeal photopheresis after lung transplantation: a 10-year single-center experience. Transplantation 2008; 86(11):1625-7.
  • Urbani L, Mazzoni A, Catalano G et al. The use of extracorporeal photopheresis for allograft rejection in liver transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 2004; 36(10):3068-70.
  • Jardine MJ, Bhandari S, Wyburn KR et al. Photopheresis therapy for problematic renal allograft rejection. J Clin Apher 2009; 24(4):161-9.
  • Whittle R, Taylor PC. Circulating B-cell activating factor level predicts clinical response of chronic graft-versus-host disease to extracorporeal photopheresis. Blood. 2011 Oct 20. [Epub ahead of print].
  • Kusztal M, Koscielska-Kasprzak K, Gdowska W et al. Extracorporeal photopheresis as an anti-rejection prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients: preliminary results. Transpl Proc. 2011 Oct; 43(8):2938-40.
  • Dignan FL, Greenblatt D, Cox M et al. Efficacy of bimonthly extracorporeal photopheresis in refractory chronic mucocutaneous GVHD. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Sep 19. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.186. [Epub ahead of print].
  • Rapheal BA, Shin DB, Suchin KR et al. High clinical response rate of Sézary syndrome to immunomodulatory therapies: prognostic markers of response. Arch Dermatol. 2011 Aug 15. [Epub ahead of print].
  • Marques MB, Schwartz J. Update on extracorporeal photopheresis in heart and lung transplantation. J Clin Apher. 2011; 26(3):146-51. Doi: 10.1002/jca.20274. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
  • Greinix HT, van Besien K, Elmaagacli AH et al. Progressive improvement in cutaneous and extracutaneous chronic graft-versus-host disease after a 24-week course of extracorporeal photopheresis-results of a crossover randomized study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011 May 11. [Epub haead of print].
  • Talpur R, Demierre MF, Geskin L et al. Multicenter photopheresis intervention trial in early-stage mycosis fungoides. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2011 Apr; 11(2):219-27. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
  • Gonzalez VM, Ramirez M Sevilla J et al. Analysis of clinical outcome and survival in pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of steroid-refractory GVHD. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2010 Nov;32(8):589-93.

 

 


Top


Policy History: 

 

Date                                        Reason                               Action

September 2010                     Annual review                     Policy revised

November 2011                      Annual review                     Policy renewed


Top


Wellmark medical policies address the complex issue of technology assessment of new and emerging treatments, devices, drugs, etc.   They are developed to assist in administering plan benefits and constitute neither offers of coverage nor medical advice. Wellmark medical policies contain only a partial, general description of plan or program benefits and do not constitute a contract. Wellmark does not provide health care services and, therefore, cannot guarantee any results or outcomes. Participating providers are independent contractors in private practice and are neither employees nor agents of Wellmark or its affiliates. Treating providers are solely responsible for medical advice and treatment of members. Our medical policies may be updated and therefore are subject to change without notice.

*Current Procedural Terminology © 2010 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

 
Contact Information
New information or technology that would be relevant for Wellmark to consider when this policy is next reviewed may be submitted to:
  Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield
  Medical Policy Analyst
  P.O. Box 9232
  Des Moines, IA 50306-9232
Like Us facebook      Follow Us twitter      Watch Us youtube
 

 

© 2012 Wellmark, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield is an Independent Licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association doing business in Iowa and South Dakota.
 
Privacy & Legal  |  Browser Information