Medical Policy: 06.01.22
Original Effective Date: August 2006
Reviewed: August 2015
Revised: August 2015
Benefit determinations are based on the applicable contract language in effect at the time the
services were rendered. Exclusions, limitations or exceptions may apply. Benefits may vary
based on contract, and individual member benefits must be verified. Wellmark determines medical
necessity only if the benefit exists and no contract exclusions are applicable. This medical
policy may not apply to FEP. Benefits are determined by the Federal Employee Program.
This Medical Policy document describes the status of medical technology at the time the document
was developed. Since that time, new technology may have emerged or new medical literature may
have been published. This Medical Policy will be reviewed regularly and be updated as scientific
and medical literature becomes available.
Scintimammography refers to the use of radiotracers with nuclear medicine imaging as a diagnostic tool for abnormalities of the breast. Breast specific gamma imaging (BSGI) also known as molecular breast imaging (MBI) refers to specific types of imaging machines that are used in conjunction with scintimammography to improve diagnostic performance.
These modalities have been proposed primarily as adjuncts to mammography and physical examination in patients who have palpable masses or suspicious mammograms as a technique to improve patient selection for biopsy. It has been suggested scintimammography has the potential to reduce unnecessary invasive biopsies by differentiating benign from malignant lesions. Breast specific gamma imaging (BSGI) or molecular breast imaging (MBI) have been suggested for evaluating suspected recurrence in patients who are at high risk, for patients in whom breast MRI is indicated but who are not candidates due to contraindications, and among patients in whom breast imaging is technically difficult, such as those with radiodense breast tissue.
Scintimammography is performed while the patient is lying prone and the camera positioned laterally, which increases the distance between the breast and the camera. Scintimammography using conventional imaging modalities has relatively poor sensitivity in detecting smaller lesions (< 15 mm), because of this relatively poor resolution BSGI/MBI were developed to address this issue.
Breast Specific Gamma Imaging (BSGI)/Molecular Breast Imaging (MBI)
Breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) and is also sometimes referred to as “molecular breast imaging (MBI)” is a scintimammography examination that uses a special breast optimized gamma camera. This is performed while the patient is seated in a position similar to that of mammography, and the breast is lightly compressed. The detector head(s) is immediately next to the breast, increasing resolution, and images can be compared with mammographic images.
BSGI/MBI uses high-resolution gamma cameras. These cameras, specially designed to image the breast, offer improved signal-to-noise ratio and improved spatial resolution to produce high-contrast images of small lesions. The dedicated breast cameras facilitate imaging from several angles to more closely resemble the cranial-caudal and medial-lateral-oblique mammographic views. This imaging takes approximately 45 minutes.
Note: The term molecular breast imaging (MBI) may be used in different ways, sometimes for any type of breast imaging involving molecular imaging, including positron emission mammography (PEM), and sometimes is limited to imaging with a type of breast specific gamma camera.
The primary radiopharmaceutical used is technetium-sestamibi (MIBI). MIBI accumulates in tissues with increased mitochondrial activity, such as rapidly growing tumors. After intravenous injection, MIBI rapidly (within two minutes) accumulates within breast tumors and slowly, over the courses of hours is “washed out” out of the cells by P-glycoprotein receptor, allowing imaging to be performed immediately after injection, but also allowing ample time for clinicians to perform all desired views and data collection.
Gamma Cameras during Breast Cancer Surgery and/or Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) Biopsy
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure is now widely method of lymph node staging in selected invasive breast cancers (unifocal, size < 2 cm, clinically N0, without previous treatment). Complete axillary clearance is no longer needed if the SLN is negative. One main pitfall is the failure to visualize SLN, resulting in incorrect tumor staging, leading to suboptimal treatment or axillary recurrence. Operative gamma cameras have therefore been developed to be used preoperatively and intra-operatively to optimize the SLN visualization and the quality control of surgery.
Based on the peer reviewed literature mobile gamma cameras for preoperative and intra-operative sentinel lymph node detection are in development. Current evidence consists of small studies with inconsistent results. Also, this has not shown improved diagnostic performance in comparison with standard gamma probes.
Positrion Emission Mammography
Positron emission mammography (PEM) is a new imaging modality that has higher resolution than PET-CT and can be performed on patients unable to have an MRI scan. PEM uses a pair of dedicated gamma radiation detectors placed above and below the breast and mild breast compression to detect coincident gamma rays after administration of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), the positron-emitting radionuclide used in whole-body PET studies for the detection of metastatic disease. Whereas PEM has high imaging sensitivity for breast lesions, its clinical utility requires further investigation. PEM cannot provide the anatomical detail that is provided by MRI. A disadvantage of PEM is the radiation exposure. Radiation doses from positron emission mammography (PEM) are 15 to 30 times higher than the dose from digital mammography.
Practice Guidelines and Position Statements
American College of Radiology
The American College of Radiology includes PEM in two sets of Appropriateness Criteria: one on breast screening and the other on the initial diagnostic work-up of breast microcalcifications. In the first, PEM is given a rating of 2 (1, 2, 3=usually not appropriate) for its use in screening women at high or intermediate risk of breast cancer and a 1 for screening women at average risk of breast cancer. It also assigns a relative radiation level of 10 to 30 mSv. It also notes that “Radiation dose from BSGI and PEM are 15-30 times higher than the dose of a digital mammogram, and they are not indicated for screening in their present form.” In the second set of appropriateness criteria, PEM was assigned a rating of 1 (usually not appropriate) for the initial work-up of all 18 variants of microcalcifications. The authors note “The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), breast specific gamma imaging (BSGI), positron emission mammography (PEM), and ductal lavage in evaluating clustered microcalcifications has not been established…. In general, they should not be used to avoid biopsy of mammographically suspicious calcifications.”
Society of Breast Imaging (SBI): The SBI Position Statement ‘Use of Alternative Imaging Approaches to Detection of Breast Cancer’ states that “often predicated on the increased vascularity associated with cancer, techniques to detect increased heat production, oxygen consumption, electrical impedance, light absorption, microwave transmission, and nitrous oxide production have indicated changes in the breast containing cancer that may assist in detection or diagnosis. While many of these approaches have received FDA approval for safety, such techniques remain either experimental or investigational, given the lack of standard techniques that can be uniformly applied and paucity of sufficient research to substantiate reliability of results. None of these tests have been shown to reduce mortality among tested women in randomized controlled trials.”
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)
Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Version 1.2014
Current evidence does not support the routine use of breast scintigraphy (eg, sestamibi scan) or ductal lavage as screening procedures.
American College of Radiology (ACR)
2013 ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening
Mammography is the recommended method for breast cancer screening of women in the general population. However, mammography alone does not perform as well as mammography plus supplemental screening in high risk women. Therefore, supplemental screening with MRI or ultrasound is recommended in selected high risk populations. Screening breast MRI is recommended in women at high risk for breast cancer on the basis of family history or genetic predisposition. Ultrasound is an option for those high risk women who cannot undergo MRI. Recent literature also supports the use of breast MRI in some intermediate risk, and ultrasound may be an option for intermediate risk women with dense breasts.
There is insufficient evidence to support the use of other imaging modalities, such as thermography, breast specific gamma imaging (BSGI), positron emission mammography (PEM), and optical imaging, for breast cancer screening, and they are not indicated for screening in their present form.
Society of Nuclear Medicine (SNM)
The Society of Nuclear Medicine (SNM) released 2010 Practice Guideline for Breast Scintigraphy with Breast Specific y-Cameras, which lists potential indications and cites references for each indication but does not provide a systemic review of the literature, including assessment of study quality. The guideline is based on consensus, and most of it is devoted to procedures and specifications of the examination, documentation and recording, quality control and radiation safety.
There is limited evidence on the use of scintimammograpy including breast specific gamma imaging (BSGI)/molecular breast imaging (MBI), including positron emission mammography (PEM) for screening women who have an elevated risk of breast cancer or in women with factors that limit the sensitivity of mammography. Also, the relatively high radiation dose currently associated with BSGI/MBI has prompted the American College of Radiology to recommend against the use of BSGI/MBI for screening. The consideration of the potential use of BSGI/MBI for screening women with dense breasts or at high risk of breast cancer should await the development of a lower dose regimen, and if warranted, larger higher quality studies with study populations representative of patients encountered in clinical practice. A large quality head-to-head comparison of BSGI/MBI and MRI would be needed, especially for women at high risk of breast cancer, because MRI, alternated with mammography, is currently the recommended screening technique.
Scintimammography including Gamma Imaging of the breast and axilla/Molecular Breast Imaging (MBI), including Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) is considered investigational for all indications, including but not limited to:
- As an adjunct to mammography for imaging breast tissue; or
- Detection of axillary metastases in patients with breast cancer; or
- Staging the axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer; or
- As a primary or second screening test for women considered at high-risk for breast cancer either by family history or confirmed BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation; or
- As a second screening test for breast cancer after an indeterminate or suspicious mammogram; or
- To evaluate palpable masses not detected by mammogram or ultrasound; or
- As an adjunct for the diagnosis of breast cancer to determine the extent of the primary lesion, evaluate the axillary lymph nodes, or detect secondary occult lesions; or
- To assess the need for a biopsy; or
- To assess response to adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer; or
- Screening for breast cancer
While recent studies have produced promising observations, patient populations were small and highly select. Larger, multicenter studies are needed to validate the potential of scintimammograpy including breast specific gamma imaging (BSGI)/molecular breast imaging (MBI) as an adjunct screening or diagnostic modality and to further identify the subset of patients for whom this technology will improve net health outcomes and contribute to clinical management. Therefore, scintimammography including BSGI/MBI is considered investigational.
The use of positron emission mammography (PEM) is considered investigational for all indications.
Preoperative or intraoperative sentinel lymph node detection using handheld or mounted mobile gamma cameras is considered investigational.
Based on the peer reviewed literature mobile gamma cameras for preoperative and intra-operative sentinel lymph node detection are in development. Current evidence consists of small studies with inconsistent results. Also, this has not shown improved diagnostic performance in comparison with standard gamma probes. Therefore, preoperative or intraoperative sentinel lymph node detection using handheld or mounted mobile gamma cameras is considered investigational.
Procedure Codes and Billing Guidelines:
- To report provider services, use appropriate CPT* codes, Modifiers, Alpha Numeric (HCPCS level 2) codes, Revenue codes, and/or diagnosis codes.
- S8080 Scintimammography (radioimmunoscintigraphy of the breast), unilateral, including supply of radiopharmaceutical
- 78800 Radiopharmaceutical localization tumor or distribution of radiopharmaceutical agent (s) limited area
- 78801 Radiopharmaceutical localization tumor or distribution of radiopharmaceutical agent(s) multiple areas
- Bongers V et al. The Use of Scintimammography for Detecting the Recurrence of Loco-regional Breast Cancer: Histopathologically Proven Results. Nucl Med Comm 2004 Feb;25(2):145-9.
- Coover LR et al. Scintimammography with dedicated breast camera detects and localizes occult carcinoma. J Nucl Med 2004 Apr;45(4):553-8.
- Papantoniou V et al. 99mTc-(V)DMSA scintimammography in the assessment of breast lesions: comparative study with 99mTc-MIBI. Eur J Nucl Med 2001 Jul;28(7):923-8.
- Chiou JF, Lin MC, Chen DR et al. Usefulness of thallium-201 SPECT scintimammography to differentiate benign from malignant breast masses in mammographically dense breasts. Cancer Invest 2003; 21(6):863-8.
- Blue Cross Blue Shield Association. Technology Evaluation Center. Scintimammography. Technology Evaluation Center Assessments. 1997; Vol.12, Tab 19.
- Fondrinier E et al. Clinical experience with 99mTc MIBI scintimammography in patients with breast microcalcifications. Breast. 2004 Aug; 13(4):316-20.
- Bone B et al. Comparison of 99mTC sestamibi scintimammography and dynamic MR imaging as adjuncts to mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Acta Radiol. 2003 Jan;44(1):28-34.
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Effectiveness of Noninvasive Diagnostic Tests for Breast Abnormalities. March 2006.
- Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G et al. Occult Breast Cancer: Scintimammography with High-Resolution Breast-specific Gamma Camera in Women at High-Risk for Breast Cancer. Radiology 2005; 237:274-280.
- O'Connor MK, Phillips SW, Hruska CB et al. Molecular Breast Imaging: Advantages and Limitations of a Scintimammographic Technique in Patients with Small Breast Tumors. Breast J. 2007 Jan-Feb; 13(1):3-11.
- Brem RF, Petrovitch I, Rapelyea JA et al. Breast-specific gamma imaging with 99mTc-Sestamibi and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer-a comparative study. Breast J 2007 Sep-Oct; 13(5):465-9.
- Schillaci O, Cossu E, Roman P et al. High-resolution gamma-camera for molecular breast imaging: First clinical results. Phys Med. 2006;21S1:121-124.
- Brem RF, Fishman M, Rapelyea JA. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ with mammography, breast-specific gamma imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study. Acad Radiol. 2007 Aug; 14(8):945-50.
- Brem RF, Floerke AC, Rapelyea JA et al. Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology. 2008 Jun;247(3):651-7.
- Zhou M, Johnson N, Blanchard D et al. Real-world application of breast-specific gamma imaging, initial experience at a community breast center and its potential impact on clinical care. Am J Surg. 2008 May;195(5):631-5;discussion 635.
- ECRI Institute. Breast-specific Gamma Imaging for Diagnosis and Screening of Breast Cancer. Plymouth Meeting (PA): ECRI Institute; 2010 January 18. 7p. [ECRI hotline response].
- Hendrick RE. Radiation doses and Cancer risks from breast imaging studies. Radiology. 2010 Aug 24. [Epub ahead of print].
- ECRI Institute. Dual-head CZT Gamma Cameras for Molecular Imaging of Breasts. Plymouth Meeting (PA): Health Technology Assessment Information Service; 2012 September. [Hotling Response].
- Bruening W, Uhl S, Fontanarosa J, Reston J, et al. Noninvasive Diagnostic Tests for Breast Abnormalities: Update of a 2006 Review. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Feb. Report No.: 12-EHC014-EF. AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Reviews.
- ECRI: Evidence Report, Breast Specific Gamma Imaging for Breast Cancer, March 2013
- NCCN: NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2013, Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, Breast Cancer Screening Considerations.
- American College of Radiology, ACR Appropriateness Criteria, 2009, Breast Microcalcifications-Initial Diagnostic Work-Up
- Society of Breast Imaging, Use of Alternative Imaging Approaches to Detection of Breast Cancer
- American College of Radiology, 2010; 7:18-27, Breast Cancer Screening with Imaging: Recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of Mammography, Breast MRI, Breast Ultrasound, and other Technologies for the Detection of Clinically Occult Breast Cancer
- Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2010, SNM Practice Guidelines for Breast Scintigraphy with Breast Specific y-Cameras 1.0
- American Cancer Society, Mammograms and other Breast Imaging Procedures
- American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Palpable Breast Masses. Last review date 2012.
- American Cancer Society. What's New in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment? Last Revised 9/11/13.
- American Cancer Society. Experimental and Other Breast Imaging Methods. Last reviewed 12/12/12.
- Carole Mathelin et. al., Case Report Optimization of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Using an Operative Gamma Camera, World Journal of Surgical Oncology 2007, 5:132. Also available www.wjso.com/content/5/1/132
- Khaldoun Kerrou, et. al. The Usefulness of a Preoperative Compact Imager, a Hand-Held y-Camera for Breast Cancer Sentinel Node Biopsy: Final Results of a Prospective Double-Blind, Clinical Study, Journal of Nuclear Medicine. Available at jnm.snmjournals.org/content/52/9/1346
- National Cancer Institute. Clinical Trials PDQ. Intraoperative Gamma Camera for Breast Cancer Surgery. October 17, 2013. www.cancer.gov
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, Version 1.2014. www.nccn.org
- American College of Radiology (ACR) 2013 Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening. J Am Coll Radiol 2013;10:11-14
- ACR-SPR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Tumor Scintigraphy (with Gamma Cameras). Amended 2014.
- UpToDate. MRI of the Breast and Emerging Technologies. Priscilla J. Slanetz, M.D., MPH, FACR. Topic last updated July 2, 2014. www.uptodate.com
- MD Consult. Nuclear Medicine Imaging of the Breast: A Novel, Physiologic Approach to Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis. Rachel F. Bren M.D., Laren R. Rechtman, MA. www.mdconsult.com
- American Cancer Society. What’s New in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment? Topic last revised 1/31/2014. www.cancer.org
- American Cancer Society. Experimental and Other Breast Imaging Methods. Tope last revised 6/10/2014. www.cancer.org
- Hendrick RE. Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies. Radiology. 2010;257(1):246–253.
- Glass SB, Shah ZA. Clinical utility of position emission mammography. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2013 Jul; 26(3): 314–319.
- Reiter M. U.S. team finds favor with new PEM unit. 8/7/2015. Auntminnie.com. Presented at AAPM annual meeting, Anaheim, CA.
Date Reason Action
June 2010 Annual review Policy renewed
December 2011 Annual review Policy renewed
December 2012 Annual review Policy renewed
June 2013 Interim review Policy revised
October 2013 Annual review Policy renewed
October 2014 Annual review Policy revised
August 2015 Annual review Policy revised
Wellmark medical policies address the complex issue
of technology assessment of new and emerging treatments, devices,
drugs, etc. They are developed to
assist in administering plan benefits and constitute neither offers of
coverage nor medical advice. Wellmark medical policies contain only a
partial, general description of plan or program benefits and do not
constitute a contract. Wellmark does not provide health care services
and, therefore, cannot guarantee any results or outcomes.
Participating providers are independent contractors in private
practice and are neither employees nor agents of Wellmark or its
affiliates. Treating providers are solely responsible for medical
advice and treatment of members. Our medical policies may be updated
and therefore are subject to change without notice.
*Current Procedural Terminology © 2012 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.